Home Page
About Us
Induction Loop Systems
Loop Questionnaire
Induction Loop Receivers
Induction Loop Testing
Equipment
Ambient Noise Compensation
Sound Field System Accessory
Multisensory Sound Lab
Airplane ALS
Loop Systems & Accessories
Pricing & Ordering
Contact Us
|
Induction
Loop ALS: A Venerable Technology Meets the New Millennium (Revised
8/03)
by Norman Lederman, M.S.,
Director of
Research & Development and Paula Hendricks, M.A., Educational
Director,
Oval Window Audio
Learning Objectives:
1. The reader shall understand the various considerations in
selecting
appropriate assistive listening technologies to suit specific
applications/tasks.
2. The reader shall understand how induction loop assistive listening
technology has evolved to overcome past limitations, making it more
appropriate
for a wider range of applications.
Abbreviations:
ADA: Americans with Disabilities Act
ALD: Assistive Listening Device
ALS: Assistive Listening System
IEC: International Electrotechnical Commission
Abstract
A comprehensive review of the hearing aid telecoil would be incomplete
without a discussion of induction loop assistive listening technology.
Based on the classic scientific principles of alternating current and
resultant
electromagnetic fields, the applications for this technology continue
to
grow more than 60 years after the advent of the first telecoil-equipped
portable hearing aid.
In the following article, the authors present a technical
primer and
several scenarios that illustrate the basic principles and typical
applications
for induction loop assistive listening systems. They then provide a
historical
perspective and an overview of current standards and state of the art
technologies.
The authors conclude that the flexibility and performance of hearing
aid
telecoils will continue to evolve, along with induction-based assistive
listening systems, as more hearing health care professionals
demonstrate
to their patients the potential of this useful technology.
Introduction
The United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) has published accessibility guidelines for
buildings,
public facilities and public transportation as required by the
Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990. In regard to assistive listening
systems,
the guidelines state the following:
“Assistive listening systems (ALS) are intended to augment
standard
public address and audio systems by providing signals which can be
received
by persons with special receivers or their own hearing aids, and which
eliminate or filter background noise. The type of ALS appropriate for a
particular application depends on the characteristics of the setting,
the
nature of the program, and the intended audience. Magnetic induction
loops,
infra-red and radio frequency systems are types of listening systems
which
are appropriate for various applications.” (1) The premise of all ALS
is
to maximize the desired signal relative to the background noise (signal
to noise ratio) by, in effect, bridging the distance between the sound
source and the hard of hearing listener.
You say ALS, I say ALD…
In late 2001, the Access Board published new guidelines
(www.access-board.gov)
pertaining to assistive listening systems, defining this technology
as:
“…devices which enhance the sound quality and volume of public address
systems for persons who are hard of hearing, including those who use
hearing
aids.” While there may not be an “official government ruling”
that
differentiates an assistive listening system (ALS) from an assistive
listening
device (ALD), professionals in the field generally refer to technology
that is at least partially installed (for example, an auditorium’s
fixed
FM transmitter, installed infrared emitter or induction loop wire) as
being
part of an assistive listening system. A body worn battery
powered
personal amplifier is referred to as an ALD. Similarly, a
portable
battery powered FM transmitter and matching receiver are generally
referred
to as ALDs. In short, “devices” are very small and “systems” are
big.
ALS Selection Considerations
There are numerous considerations involved in the selection of the
most appropriate ALS for a given application (2). Some of these
considerations
include:
-
Is the ALS appropriate for the size and location of the listening area?
-
Are there architectural barriers that might affect ALS effectiveness?
-
Is signal spill over a concern?
-
Is confidentiality important?
-
Do the people who will be using the system have telecoil-equipped
hearing
aids?
-
Is there local interference from radio stations, electrical systems
and/or
lighting?
-
Who will install the system?
-
What are the maintenance requirements and associated costs?
While induction loops are the oldest form of wireless ALS, this
technology
remains viable and is in active use in many homes, government
buildings,
public facilities and houses of worship (3). In Europe and other parts
of the world, induction loop ALS have been popular for over 50
years.
The primary advantage of this technology, and the reason for its
longevity,
are beyond debate: All telecoil-equipped hearing aids have the
capability
to receive induction loop ALS transmissions without the need for
special
receivers and earphones. In America, at least one-third of hearing aids
already in use by the hard of hearing public are telecoil-equipped and
as a result are 100% compatible with all induction loop ALS (4). In the
United Kingdom and Scandinavia the majority of hearing aids are
telecoil-equipped
(5).
Induction Loop ALS Primer
Any wire that carries an electrical current inherently
generates an
electromagnetic field. A more efficient generator of
electromagnetic
fields results when the wire is wound in a multiple turn coil. Hearing
aid compatible telephones and induction loop ALS exploit this basic
premise
of electronics by generating electromagnetic fields, respectively, from
a tiny coil inside the telephone handset, or from a loop of wire that
encompasses
a room. The compatible telephone and the induction loop ALS both
generate electromagnetic fields that correspond to the original audio
signal.
In both cases, the basic premise of ALS remains constant…to minimize
the
deleterious effects of background noise by bridging the distance
between
the sound source and listener
Up until the 1970s practically all telephones were
compatible
with hearing aid telecoils due to the substantial electromagnetic
leakage
generated by the handset’s magnet-coil earphone transducer. Later
telephone technologies introduced smaller and more efficient components
that resulted in less leakage, thereby sacrificing telecoil
compatibility.
Activism by hard of hearing people resulted in public laws (such as
PL100-394)
that eventually required all telephones to be hearing aid compatible.
The induction loop ALS consists of three
components:
1. The audio source (microphone or audio signal from existing public
address system)
2. A special loop amplifier
3. The loop wire
In the typical induction loop set up, the loop wire is
installed around
the perimeter of the targeted seating area. The audio signals
from
microphones or the public address system are amplified and sent through
the loop wire, resulting in an electromagnetic field that mirrors that
frequency and intensity characteristics of the original signal
input.
By switching the hearing aid/cochlear implant or receiver to “T”
(telephone/telecoil)
the hard of hearing listener effectively disconnects the device’s
microphone
and in its place connects a small coil of wire to the input of
the
hearing aid amplifier. This coil of wire (the telecoil) is very
sensitive
to nearby electromagnetic fields. The electromagnetic field
generated
from the telephone or induction loop system induces a corresponding
signal
in the telecoil, which is then amplified and delivered to the
listener.
This process of inducing an electrical current in a circuit as a result
of a nearby electrical current flow is called induction, hence the term
induction loop system.
Telephones and Induction Loop ALS
There are distinct similarities in performance and technical
considerations
between hearing aid compatible telephones and induction loop ALS:
-
Both are sensitive to the distance and orientation of the hearing aid
telecoil
relative to the plane of the generating field. Depending on the
physical
dimensions and power of the electromagnetic field, the resultant signal
will be diminished with distance. With the telephone, the
listener’s
hearing aid is closely coupled to the field generated by a small coil
within
the handset receiver, resulting in minimal signal loss as a function of
distance. With room-size induction loop ALS, sufficient power
must
be provided by an amplifier that is current/impedance matched to the
loop
wire in order to create a magnetic field of sufficient quality and
strength
as per specific standards discussed later. The fields generated
by
telephones and induction loop ALS are perpendicular to the plane of the
telephone handset coil/induction loop. Because of the differences
in field orientation between telephones and induction loops (including
neckloops), the best mounting for telecoils is a near-vertical position.
-
The performance of both may be affected by spurious electrical noise
from
sources such as power lines, fluorescent lighting and cathode-ray tube
televisions/computer monitors. Switching a hearing aid to “T”
transforms
the instrument into a magnetism sensing device. In some
instances,
electromagnetic fields generated by AC power lines and other electrical
equipment may cause interference to hearing aid telecoil users.
In
most cases, to pick up interfering noise or buzz, the listener must be
situated in very close proximity (within 2 feet) of fluorescent
lighting,
TVs, or other electrical equipment. A pre-installation listening
check should be performed before an induction loop ALS or hearing aid
compatible
telephone is installed in order to identify, and if possible, remedy
potential
sources of interference. Examples of easily correctable sources
of
interference include: faulty lighting ballasts, damaged surge
protectors,
and poor quality light dimmers. In some instances, the use of an
induction loop ALS may be ruled out or a telephone relocated due to
high
levels of electrical noise interference.
-
While telephone cross talk or spill over is not a problem due to the
very
small fields generated by the hand set receiver, multiple
induction
loop ALS may interfere with each other. The electromagnetic
fields created by large-area induction loop ALS inherently spill out of
their looped areas. This can cause interference problems for
users
of other nearby induction loop ALS or telephones. To date, a
practical
electrical noise cancellation/shielding method has never been
successfully
marketed for ALS applications. In addition to the obvious remedy
of proper planning (for example, spacing loop systems on the same floor
by at least twice the distance of the longest loop side), two technical
approaches do exist: low-spill induction loops and the 3-D
Loop.
The former approach usually involves the use of a secondary
cancellation
field that partially suppresses the signal spill over from the primary
loop field. The newest approach is the 3-D Loop that minimizes
spill
over by utilizing a complex grid of loop wires sandwiched within a
flexible
mat powered by digital signal processing.
Looping the Past
The first patented magnetic induction loop communication system was
invented by Joseph Poliakoff of Great Britain in 1937. The first
wearable
hearing aid to incorporate a telecoil is reported to be the Multitone
VPM
in 1938 (6). Used for years in Europe, induction loop ALS technologies
debuted in America shortly after World War II. Popular in American
educational
settings for over two decades, interest in the technology peaked in the
late 60’s. Even though no comprehensive technical standards were in
place
for the manufacture and performance of induction loop ALS and hearing
aid
telecoils, the consensus of numerous researchers at the time indicate
that
this technology was a very useful, simple and cost-effective means for
providing hearing assistance in classrooms and other public areas
(7,8,9).
Nevertheless, the use of induction loop ALS declined as improved AM, FM
and infrared technologies were developed.
As detailed in the next section, international standards for
induction
loop ALS were published in 1981, resulting in a consistently high level
of performance and a resurgence of interest in this technology.
Validation
was not far behind. Subsequent comparative studies proved that a well
designed
induction loop ALS is as effective as FM and infrared technologies for
improving the intelligibility of the spoken word (10).
Beyond the technological reasons, it is interesting to explore
the cultural
reasons why the use of induction loop ALS in public facilities has
continued
to hold steady in the United Kingdom and Scandinavian countries for
decades.
Most importantly, for many years the national public health care
systems
in these countries have made the telecoil standard equipment in most
dispensed
hearing aids. As a result, practically all public facilities are
equipped
with induction loop ALS. Supporting technical standards have been
developed
and enforced by national organizations in Europe such as the Royal
National
Institute for the Deaf. Europe’s approach to accessibility and
universal
design adds credence to the maxim coined in the 90’s: “If you
build
it, they will come!”
Back in America, “smaller & newer is better” began to take
hold
in the hearing aid industry of the 1980’s. As hearing aids shrank in
size,
features began to disappear, and the telecoil was one of the first to
go.
The popularity of induction loop ALS followed suit. The venerable
telecoil
was gone…but not forgotten. Fueled by the Telephone Compatibility Act
of
1988 (Public Law 100-394) and activist organizations such as Self Help
for Hard of Hearing People, Inc., high quality telecoils and supporting
technical standards began to emerge in the early 90’s. A new and
improved
generation of induction loop ALS standards and technologies accompanied
these telecoil advancements.
Standards
One of the factors that hindered performance consistency of induction
loop ALS for many years was the lack of clear technical standards. In
1981,
the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) published:
Methods
of Measurement of Electro-acoustical Characteristics of Hearing Aids:
Part
4: Magnetic Field Strength in Audio-frequency Induction Loops for
Hearing
Aid Purposes (IEC 118-4). This standard, while not comprehensive,
provided
basic field strength criteria that were important to designers and
installers
of this technology. In Europe, other standards built on IEC 118-4 such
as British Standard 7594 (1993) that expands on important factors such
as site assessment and methods and tools for measuring magnetic fields.
In 1999, the United States Access Board solicited
recommendations from
experts in the field that provided additional specifications pertaining
to the following aspects of induction loop ALS:
-
Loop Wire Installation: at least 80% of the installed
loop wire
should be free of the influences of ferrous metals that can adversely
affect
the signal transmission.
-
Field Strength: as per IEC-118-4 with an added
recommendation that
the measurement be “A” weighted to disallow the influences of inaudible
50/60 Hertz low frequency power line/electrical equipment noise, and
that
the measurement at the center of the loop be 100 mA/meter +/- 3 dB at a
height of 1.2 meters, using a 1 kHz sine wave signal.
-
Input Signal Compression: in order to achieve a
long-time average
field strength of 100 mA/meter, and to maximize signal intelligibility
and listener comfort regardless of fluctuating signal levels, an
automatic
gain control, signal compression and/or adjustable non-distorting peak
limiter must be employed at the input of induction loop ALS systems.
Recommended
compression ratios: 4:1 for music and up to 20:1 for speech.
-
Frequency Response: should comply with the IEC 118-4
specifications
of 100 Hz-5 kHz, +/- 3 dB. Measurements taken with an “A”
weighted
field strength meter will need to be corrected to compensate for the
substantial
low frequency roll off characteristic of this weighting. The use of a
graphic
equalizer is beneficial in certain situations where the environment is
affecting the system’s frequency response, and/or the listening
audience
is composed of people who have specific needs and/or preferences.
-
Ambient Electrical Interference: sources of
electromagnetic noise
that may in some instances interfere with the proper functioning of
induction
loop ALS include light dimmers, electrical wiring, TVs, computer
monitors
and faulty fluorescent lighting. As with all types of ALS an on-site
pre-installation
evaluation of possible sources of interference should be performed.
With
induction loop ALS, ambient noise should not exceed 25
milliamperes/meter
or –12 dB (“A” weighted) relative to 100 milliamperes/meter
as measured at any seat within the area that is to be enclosed by the
loop
system. Using an induction loop receiver or telecoil-equipped
hearing
aid, listening checks may be required to determine if the noise falls
within
the frequency response of these devices. For example, most
hearing
aids and induction loop receivers do not reproduce sounds below 100
Hz.
As a result, the fundamental frequency/first harmonic of 50/60 Hz.
power
line noise should not cause a problem, even though it may be measurable
on some linear response field strength meters, unless higher audible
harmonics
of the noise are present.
-
Signal Spill Over: in the event adjacent areas are
equipped with
induction loop ALS, signal spill over must not exceed 12.5
milliamperes/meter,
or –18 dB (“A” weighted), relative to 100 milliamperes/meter, as
measured
at any seated position within the looped areas.
-
System Signal to Noise: electrical signal to noise
ratio of the
loop amplifier output as measured directly at 1 kHz, must be at least
+30
dB (unweighted) relative to the system’s internal noise at an output
level
sufficient to deliver a 100 milliamperes/meter field strength as per
IEC
118-4 specifications.
-
Distortion: With an input signal of 1 kHz and the
system set up
to deliver a field strength of 100 milliamperes/meter, total harmonic
distortion
must not exceed 3%.
-
Listening Tests: regularly scheduled listening checks
of all assistive
listening systems is strongly recommended, preferably before each use.
When induction loop ALS installations meet the aforementioned technical
specifications, users can expect the highest level of
performance.
Today’s Induction Loop ALS Technologies
Conventional Loops
Conventional large area induction loop ALS continue to have varied
applications at home, in meeting rooms, theatres, vehicles, boats,
schools,
houses of worship and other public facilities. These systems consist of
a dedicated loop amplifier and loop wire that can accept microphones
and/or
easily interface with existing public address systems.
Low-voltage
models are used in passenger vehicles and special systems have been
used
in commercial vehicles.
Major advances in induction loop ALS technology have occurred
in recent
years that take advantage of digital signal processing and
miniaturization
of electronic components. Two examples are a three-dimensional
induction
loop and a self-contained portable induction loop ALS.
3-D Loop
The two inherent limitations of induction loop technology that were
not addressed by any commercially available products for many years
were
signal spill over and inconsistent signal uniformity. The former refers
to the tendency for large area inductive loop fields to pass through
walls,
floors and ceilings thereby interfering with adjacent looped
areas/rooms.
The latter refers to fluctuating signal reception, dependent on hearing
aid orientation and telecoil placement inside the hearing aid relative
to the induction loop field.
In the early 1990’s, the U.S. Department of Education’s
National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation Research supported the development of
a three-dimensional (3-D) induction loop ALS. The objectives of this
research
and development project were to design, validate and commercialize an
induction
loop ALS that eliminated or minimized the problems of signal spill over
and inconsistent signal uniformity (11). Unlike conventional loop
systems that use a continuous single loop wire that encircles the
listening
area, the patented 3-D Loop consists of four loop wires laid out in a
prescribed
geometric configuration, prefabricated and sandwiched into a flexible
mat
. This mat, measuring 9 feet x 9 feet, or 12 feet by 12 feet, is
designed
to be installed under an area rug or a room’s carpeting. Multiple mats
may be used to cover larger areas. Digital signal processing
electronics
and low impedance amplifiers are employed to create diverse
electromagnetic
field orientations, largely confined to the area immediately above the
mat. Stepping off the mat results in an abrupt signal attenuation of 30
dB. Owing to the condensed geometry of the loops, the height of the
fields
is also controlled, calibrated at a height of approximately 39 inches
from
the floor. Consequently, signal spill over to rooms above and below is
controlled.
The complete 3-D Loop consists of one or more mats,
amplifiers, signal
processing electronics, environmental microphone(s) and wireless
microphone
systems contained in a singular control box. Because the wireless
microphones
are transmitting on different frequencies to their respective receivers
contained in the 3-D Loop control box, multiple microphones may
be
used in team teaching and large meeting situations.
The 3-D Loop was initially field tested in a variety of
settings with
hard of hearing adults and children, including: two preschool to grade
12 programs for deaf and hard of hearing students, a state commission
for
deaf and hard of hearing people, a university specializing in meeting
the
needs of deaf and hard of hearing students, and an international
airport.
The published listener and user evaluations from these test sites were
very supportive of this new development in induction loop ALS
technology
(12). The field test results, including subjective responses, are
summarized
below:
-
Adjacent room attenuation of better than –40 dB could be achieved by
distancing
the 3-D Loop mats six feet from common walls. Signal spillover was
judged
to be inaudible by hearing aid users. This is in stark contrast
to
conventional loops in which room to room attenuation may be as little
as
–11 dB, and signal spill over can be audible to many hearing aid users.
-
Adolescents were especially motivated to use their own hearing aids,
rather
than more obtrusive FM auditory trainers.
-
Teachers and audiologists reported that many students exhibited greater
awareness of sound and attended more readily to sounds presented
through
the 3-D Loop as compared to their response with FM auditory
trainer systems.
-
Teachers were very positive about how easy it was to use the 3-D
Loop.
Rather than having to check and troubleshoot FM receiver cords,
rechargeable
batteries and other damage prone components of FM auditory trainers,
the
daily task of setting up a 3-D Loop was reduced to a basic hearing aid
check and test of the teacher microphone.
-
When used in settings where active infants and toddlers were fitted
with
behind the ear hearing aids, school staff reported excellent signal
uniformity
irrespective of hearing aid/telecoil orientation. Lab tests revealed a
maximum +/- 3 dB signal variation with 360 degrees rotation of the
hearing
aid over a 3-D Loop mat. In contrast, a hearing aid rotated 90 degrees
in a conventional loop system will exhibit a signal variation of
greater
than 40 dB.
-
At one site, hard of hearing staff could not use their telephones when
a conventional induction loop ALS was in use in a nearby meeting room.
This problem was resolved with the 3-D Loop.
-
Multiple wireless microphone capability was often mentioned as a
positive
feature of the 3-D Loop. Also, the system’s audio mixer facilitated
easy
interfacing with external equipment such as VCRs, CD players, etc.
-
When comparing costs of competing technologies, the anticipated cost
and
minimal maintenance requirements for the 3-D Loop were attractive to
school
administrators, audiologists and facility managers. The primary
additional
cost consideration was the need for carpeting/rugs to cover the 3-D
Loop
mats.
Portable Loop
From the earliest systems to today’s designs, induction loop ALS have
incorporated several separate components: loop wire, amplifier and
microphone(s).
Furthermore, due to the high electrical current requirements of the
technology,
induction loop ALS are usually tethered to a nearby AC wall
outlet.
A recent breakthrough in this technology is a short-range,
self-contained
induction loop ALS that houses the loop wire, electronics, rechargeable
battery and microphone in a portable enclosure measuring approximately
10” x 11” x 4” and weighing just over 3 pounds. Except for the AC
adapter/battery
charger and accessory plug-in microphone, there are no external
components.
The effective range of this system is 3-5 feet. Intended for use
by one or two listeners at a time, applications include: information
counters,
work areas, reception areas, meetings, TV viewing, etc. This portable
system
has proven useful in hearing aid clinics, banks, stores, hotels,
hearing
aid quality control departments, rehabilitation centers, government and
state agencies, and for personal use. Using a microprocessor
controlled
power supply, noise gating and automatic gain control to maximize
efficiency
and performance, the system’s rechargeable battery powers the unit for
24 hours between charging.
Induction Loop ALS Applications
To illustrate the technical concepts, versatility and potential
usefulness
of induction loop ALS, the following three scenarios depict hearing
impaired
people in a variety of settings:
Scenario #1
George and Sallie are a hard of hearing couple. Both are proud of their
affiliation with a hard of hearing consumer organization where they
have
learned about hearing loss, hearing aid technology, and assistive
listening
systems. They recently purchased hearing aids that have various
features
that maximize their communication abilities. Their favorite feature is
the telecoil. By simply switching their hearing aids to “T”
(telephone/telecoil),
they are able to magnetically couple their hearing aids to compatible
telephones
and various assistive listening devices and systems that have an
inductive
electromagnetic output. The resultant improved signal to noise ratio
benefits
George and Sallie’s comprehension of speech.
George and Sallie are active members of their church and have
educated
the board members about the value of assistive listening systems. Using
a small conventional induction loop ALS and a basic diagram, they
illustrated
for the church board exactly how a loop wire is placed around seating
areas
(typically in the ceiling, on the floor or under carpeting), and is
powered
by a special amplifier. All audio signals from the church’s public
address
system are patched into the loop amplifier where they are changed into
electromagnetic signals transmitted by the loop wire. These
electromagnetic
signals are easily received by individuals with hearing aids and
cochlear
implants fitted with telephone switches/telecoils, or with portable
induction
receivers.
George uses his own hearing aid to demonstrate that switching
to “T”
disconnects the aid’s internal microphone and connects in its place a
tiny
coil of wire, the telecoil, thereby transforming the hearing aid into a
magnetism sensing, rather than sound sensing instrument. George’s
hearing
aid also has a combination “MT” (microphone-telecoil) mode that enables
him to hear Sallie and other nearby sounds, while at the same time
receiving
signals from an induction loop ALS. Switched to “T”, acoustic
feedback
is eliminated and undesirable background noise is greatly attenuated.
Only
the desirable signal is received from a compatible telephone or
ALS.
After the induction loop ALS is installed by a local sound
contracting
company, George and Sallie and other hard of hearing friends enter the
sanctuary, sit down and switch their hearing aids to “T”. They are now
connected to the public address system, without the need for special
receivers
or headphones. The board also has provided low cost induction loop
receivers
for people who do not own telecoil-equipped hearing aids. The system’s
unobtrusiveness, ease of use, cost-effectiveness and low maintenance
are
appreciated by the church’s board of directors as well as hard of
hearing
congregants.
Scenario #2
Sophie is an audiologist at a school for deaf and hard of hearing
children.
She is considering installing 3-D Loops in several classrooms. Each
classroom
has 12 students and they all own telecoil-equipped hearing aids. She
realizes
that it would be more expensive to equip each student with new FM or
infrared
technology than it would be to install a 3-D Loop. Furthermore,
maintenance
costs for special receivers are a significant part of long-term budget
planning. Sophie is especially attracted to the 3-D Loop because the
students
will be able to optimize listening using their own hearing aids, the
same
ones they wear outside of school, rather than swapping them for special
receivers each day (keeping in mind that the hearing aids’ telecoil and
microphone frequency response and sensitivity may be different from
each
other). The system also allows for multiple wireless microphones
operating
on different frequencies because the respective receivers are contained
within the 3-D Loop control box. All signals are received and
mixed
by the control box and then directed to the 3-D mat concealed beneath
the
room’s carpeting. External audio equipment such as VCRs and CD players
also may be connected to the main control box. Sophie looks forward to
exposing the students to a variety of sounds by means of the 3-D Loop.
Scenario #3
Isabelle is the manager of a bank. She has been wearing
telecoil-equipped
hearing aids for several years and finds them to be very useful while
conducting
business over the telephone. Isabelle’s audiologist recently introduced
her to the potential of using assistive listening devices and systems
in
conjunction with her hearing aids. She was most pleased with the
results
using a portable self-contained induction loop ALS smaller than a
briefcase
that she can use at her desk and in meetings. She plans to try these
systems
at teller windows and other locations throughout the bank for the
benefit
of hearing impaired customers.
The scenarios cited above are based on actual applications and
are demonstrative
of the proven flexibility, cost-effectiveness and practicality of
induction
loop ALS.
Looping the Future
For the remainder of this first decade of the new millennium we foresee
exciting progress for hearing aid telecoils and associated
induction-based
assistive listening technologies:
-
Higher fidelity telecoils will continue to be developed as increasing
numbers
of hearing aid users demand more from dispensers and manufacturers.
-
Telecoils will become more readily available in all types of hearing
aids.
-
Automatic telecoils that are triggered by induction loop ALS as well
as
telephones will become available.
-
New standards governing the installation and performance of induction
loop
ALS will be published in the United States, and the means for measuring
and verifying the criteria will become readily available along with low
cost measurement equipment and concise guidelines.
-
Induction loop technologies will continue to evolve as the integration
of microprocessor electronics and digital signal processing becomes
more
commonplace in all ALS.
-
New ambient electromagnetic interference cancellation technologies will
make it possible to measure hearing aid telecoils and use induction
loop
ALS and hearing aid compatible telephones in environments with high
electrical
noise.
Conclusion
We don’t know if the early designers of induction loop communication
systems envisioned that 65 years later millions of hard of hearing
people
around the world would have benefited from this technology. We do know
that after all these years, the magnetic induction process still
remains
an elegant universal design solution to the perennial challenge of
optimizing
the signal to noise equation for hearing aid users.
References
1. ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG),
United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board,
Washington, DC 20004
2. Assistive Listening Devices in Education and Vocational
Rehabilitation.
Rehab Briefs, 1990. PSI International, Arlington, VA; v. XII: 10
3. Hendricks, P, Lederman, N. Looping the World: Re-discovering a
hearing
assistance system, Parts I and II. Hearing Health 1998; v. 14:3:32-33,
v. 4:45-46
4. Ross, M, Bakke, M. Large-area assistive listening systems: An
overview
and some recommendations. The Hearing Journal 2000; v. 53:6:52-60
5. Ross, M. Telecoils as Assistive Listening Devices. Hearing Loss
2000, Nov/Dec: 32-33
6. Berger, KW. The Hearing Aid: Its Operation and Development, Livonia,
MI: National Hearing Aid Society; 1984:103
7. Ling, D. Loop induction for auditory training for deaf children.
Maico Audiological Library Series 5, Report 2; 1966
8. Matkin, ND, Olsen, WO. Response of hearing aids with induction loop
amplification systems. American Annals of the Deaf 1970;
115:73-78
9. Calvert, DR. A comparison of auditory amplifiers in the classroom
in a school for the deaf. Volta Review 1964; 66:544
10. Nabelek, A. Comparison of public address systems with assistive
listening systems. Hearing Instruments 1987; 38(2): 29-32
11. Hendricks, P, Lederman, N. Development of a three-dimensional
induction
assistive listening system. Hearing Instruments 1991; 42(9):37-38
12. Lederman, N, Hendricks, P. Induction Loop Assistive Listening
Systems.
In: Ross, M, ed. Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss:
Compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act. York Press, Baltimore, MD;
1994:27-32
KEYWORDS:
Assistive listening systems
Induction loop assistive listening systems
Hearing aid telecoils
CEU Questions
1. The types of assistive listening systems that are in compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act are (circle one or more):
a) induction loop
b) infrared
c) vibrotactile alerting devices
d) FM
e) visual displays
2. Some of the considerations in choosing an ALS are (circle
one or
more):
a) average temperature of the room
b) the need for confidentiality
c) telecoil-equipped hearing aids in
use
d) elevation of the room
e) maintenance costs
3. Compared to FM and infrared technologies, the biggest
advantage of
induction loop ALS is:
a) ease of installing the system
b) lowest expense
c) telecoil-equipped hearing aid users
don’t require special receivers
d) small size of the system
e) light weight of the system
4. What is the international standard pertaining to the
technical performance
of induction loop ALS?
a) ADA 1990
b) SHHH 104
c) IEC 118-4
d) ASA 675
e) EAA 98
5. What are three types of induction loop ALS technologies?
(circle)
a) conventional
b) three-dimensional
c) infrared
d) FM
e) portable self contained
Correct answers:
1. a,b,d
2. b,c,e
3. c
4. c
5. a,b,e
Originally published in Telephones and Telecoils: Past,
Present
and Future; Editor in Chief, Catherine V. Palmer, Ph.D;
Guest
Editor, Jerry L. Yanz, Ph.D, Seminars in Hearing, volume 24, number 1,
February, 2003.
PLEASE CONTACT US BY E-MAIL,
OR PHONE/FAX 303-447-3607 FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY OF OUR INDUCTION
LOOP ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEMS.
Home Page // About
Us // Induction Loop Assistive
Listening
Systems // Induction Loop Receivers
// Induction Loop Testing Equipment
//
Ambient Noise Compensation //
Sound
Field System Accessory // Vibrotactile/Multisensory
Sound Lab //
Airplane Assistive Listening
System // Loop Systems & Accessories Pricing &
Ordering // Contact Us
This site created with the help of The
Write Direction, Kauai HI.
|